Skip to content
Basis Desk

New: Basis Desk Verify for Chrome — fact-check crypto news on any page, free.Add to Chrome →

Regulation & Policy · 1 min read

UK High Court Considers Applicable Law in Multi-Billion Pound Bitcoin Forfeiture

Victims of a £4.1 billion Chinese Ponzi scheme run by Zhimin Qian seek proprietary claims over billions in seized Bitcoin under English law.

Editorial oversight: Julian Mercer, Chief Editor
Neutral

At a glance Court ruling

What happened
The UK High Court opened hearings to determine whether English or Chinese law governs claims to billions in Bitcoin seized from fraudster Zhimin Qian.
Why it matters
The ruling will set legal precedent on how cross-border victims can assert proprietary ownership over cryptocurrency forfeited under the Proceeds of Crime Act.
Who is affected
Chinese fraud victims, the UK Director of Public Prosecutions, and defendant Zhimin Qian.
What's next
The court will rule on the choice-of-law issue before evaluating individual proprietary claims by affected investors.
Primary source
caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk: Director of Public Prosecutions v Zhimin Qian & Anor - Find Case Law

Key points

  • UK DPP seized billions of pounds in Bitcoin tied to a £4.1 billion Chinese Ponzi scheme operated by Zhimin Qian.
  • At least 128,409 investment contracts were entered into by Chinese victims prior to Qian's flight to London in 2017.
  • The English High Court must decide whether English or Chinese law governs Section 281 claims to the seized cryptocurrency.

The English High Court of Justice has initiated proceedings to determine which legal framework governs claims brought by victims seeking to recover billions of pounds worth of seized Bitcoin 1. The Director of Public Prosecutions recovered the assets under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 after investigating a fraudulent operation orchestrated by Chinese national Zhimin Qian 1.

According to an agreed statement of assumed facts filed with the court, Qian set up Tianjin Lantian Gerui Electronic Technology Co Limited in March 2014, orchestrating approximately 10 Ponzi schemes that took in 40,228,350,969 Chinese renminbi (roughly £4.1 billion) between 2014 and 2017 1. The company, which was never licensed to sell financial products, marketed schemes involving digital currency, insurance services, and purification devices across China 1. Qian fled China into Myanmar in July 2017 to avoid arrest and entered London in September 2017, where she has lived since 1. In her basis of plea dated Sept. 29, 2025, Qian conceded that the schemes were unlawful under Chinese law 1.

Jurisdictional Conflict Over Seized Crypto

The disputed assets consist mostly of $BTC seized by UK authorities, which are now contested by thousands of Chinese investors under Section 281 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 1. An audit referenced in court documents identified at least 128,409 investment contracts signed in connection with the fraud 1. The High Court must now decide whether English law, Chinese law, or a hybrid of both applies to adjudicate whether victims hold direct proprietary interests in the recovered funds 1.

The proceedings represent one of the largest cryptocurrency forfeiture disputes globally, aligning with broader cross-border enforcement efforts documented as regulators claw back millions in crypto fraud and theft cases 1. Justice Turner noted that no evidence has yet been presented regarding Chinese law or the individual factual basis of each claim, leaving the applicable conflict-of-laws principles as the opening hurdle for the litigation 1. At the time of writing, $BTC traded at $83,457.

Sources

  1. [1] Director of Public Prosecutions v Zhimin Qian & Anor - Find Case Law — caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk, October 13, 2026

Written by Basis Desk's newsroom system from the primary sources above and machine-verified against them before publication. Market figures marked "at the time of writing" come from live exchange data. Report an error: corrections@basisdesk.news · corrections policy.

Community read
How do you read this story for the assets involved? One vote a day, anonymous.
Be the first to vote

The Daily Brief, in your inbox at 07:00 ET

Five stories, the numbers that moved, what to watch. Three minutes. No hype, no advice, unsubscribe in one click.

Not financial advice. Basis Desk publishes information, not recommendations. Crypto assets are volatile and you can lose what you invest.